Skip to main content

Try to define as precisely as possible these words: a. triangle, b. love, c. table What is the difference? Which was easiest to define? 




A.) A triangle is an area with three sides joined together to form what we call shapes.

B.) Love is a mix of different emotional states, which are all experienced with strong, positive responses. 

C.) A table is a piece of furniture with one leg or more, connected to a top. 


I think love was the hardest term to define as it is a very subjective term. Many people define love differently. Some people think that love doesn't exist while others think it does. Some people tend to think of it in more of a scientific viewpoint while others don't. Unlike a triangle, and a table there is no one 'right' answer for what love is. Everyone knows the concept of a table, and a rough idea of what a table looks like. We cannot say the same thing for love. In fact, another thing that makes love harder to define is infatuation. Many people can feel infatuated towards another person and mistake it for love even though infatuation can be more intense, but also short-lived.

The easiest word to define was table. No matter how poor or rich you are, you have probably heard of, and seen a table. A table usually consists of one or more legs connected to a top, which is used to place things. This meaning is set, and doesn't change, which makes it easier to define, and understand than love.


How would you try to explain to a blind person what the word RED means? What does this suggest to you about the limitations of definitions? 

Trying to explain to a blind person what the word red means would be quite hard. I would say that it is a color, which is all around us. I would describe it as a color that evokes strong feelings such as anger. I would also show them a candle, or a stove and let them feel some of the heat from the fire. I would tell them that it is heat, and that heat is usually red (fire). This would make it easier for them to understand. 

To me, this suggests that the limitations of our definitions are based upon our previous experiences and senses. For example, I can see the color red, and can feel the heat. If someone cannot see the color red then they would not have any basis from, which to go off from, which could give them the wrong idea of the color red even with a good explanation.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

There has always been a big debate about art and whether or not any ethical considerations should limit artists in their scope of inquiry. Recently on March 31st 2017, a Netflix original called 13 reasons why sparked the internet with controversy, argument, and debate due to it's subject. This teen drama is about a high-school student named Hannah Baker who suicides and leaves 13 tapes to 13 different people. Each of these people had 1 tape dedicated to them, which they all heard. As the tapes continue, we go through the days/weeks before her suicide and all the events that led her to this.  Almost immediately, suicide prevention experts were concerned people would suicide and follow this path. In July a research published at JAMA Internal Medicine showed that people searched about suicide almost 20% more in 19 days and 900,000 to 1.5 million more searches than normal. Of course this sparked a lot of controversy and debate. In fact, Netflix almost had to pull the show off, and ban...
On what basis did you make your decisions?  What part of the questions did you find particularly difficult or particularly easy?  What did you learn or have reinforced for you regarding how you make ethical decisions? First, I got a moral parsimony score of 58%. This was because there were questions at the start that didn't follow all my moral ideas. Additionally, it could have been due to one of the bases.  I based my answers on multiple different factors. First, I made sure to not have a certain favoritism to people in certain different geographical locations. Second, unconsciously I showed direct favoritism to people in my family. In fact, I got a moral parsimony score of 17% on this aspect, which significantly lowered my overall moral parsimony score. Next, I unconsciously believed that acting and omitting aren't that different in the situations that they gave us meaning that I had quite a high moral parsimony score in that rega...
Do we really know what goes on in our head? Many people feel like they can control their emotions well as they think that their experiences are sufficient to know about what a good and bad decision is. Throughout our lifetime we experience many different things and the original experience plays a big part in future experiences, and the decisions we make. Many people don't realize this as most of our decisions to this are subconscious until they are obviously shown. The person who wrote this gave a very good example. She had a 'gross foods party' for her daughter's 12th birthday party. She served normal food, and drink such as pizza, and juice except that she smeared cheese with green fruit coloring, giving it a moldy look. The juice was also served in urine sample cups. She even served mashed food onto baby diapers for an extra stimulation. Even though the children were supposed to like pizza, mashed potatoes and juice (as that is the normal reaction). Many kids di...