Skip to main content







The somatic marker theory, originally proposed by Antoni Damasio suggests that the way we process emotions and feelings can give us a subconscious bias to change our actions, affecting our social behavior. He was a neuroscientist and based this theory off actual parts of our brain. We all have things called 'somatic markers', which are body signals sent from our brain such as a rapid heartbeat, which allow us to process emotions clearly. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

There has always been a big debate about art and whether or not any ethical considerations should limit artists in their scope of inquiry. Recently on March 31st 2017, a Netflix original called 13 reasons why sparked the internet with controversy, argument, and debate due to it's subject. This teen drama is about a high-school student named Hannah Baker who suicides and leaves 13 tapes to 13 different people. Each of these people had 1 tape dedicated to them, which they all heard. As the tapes continue, we go through the days/weeks before her suicide and all the events that led her to this.  Almost immediately, suicide prevention experts were concerned people would suicide and follow this path. In July a research published at JAMA Internal Medicine showed that people searched about suicide almost 20% more in 19 days and 900,000 to 1.5 million more searches than normal. Of course this sparked a lot of controversy and debate. In fact, Netflix almost had to pull the show off, and ban...
Eyewitnesses: First-order knowledge claims: Over 70 percent of false convictions that have been overturned through DNA testing involved eyewitnesses who falsely chose a suspect, leading to the prosecution of the suspect. Eyewitness misidentification is the single biggest contributor to wrongful convictions. Certain measures can be taken to help make eyewitness accounts more accurate. Larger police departments have an easier time than smaller ones in incorporating many of their proposed reforms. Two recent U.S. Supreme Court rulings have prohibited life sentences for minors without the possibility of parole. Second-order knowledge claims: If the police reformed their system, then the prosecuting process would be a lot more fair, and would help reduce the number of innocents going to jail due to false eyewitnesses. We can be certain that faulty eyewitness testimonies are very common, and lead to many unfair prosecutions. It is certain that eyewitness testimonies ...
On what basis did you make your decisions?  What part of the questions did you find particularly difficult or particularly easy?  What did you learn or have reinforced for you regarding how you make ethical decisions? First, I got a moral parsimony score of 58%. This was because there were questions at the start that didn't follow all my moral ideas. Additionally, it could have been due to one of the bases.  I based my answers on multiple different factors. First, I made sure to not have a certain favoritism to people in certain different geographical locations. Second, unconsciously I showed direct favoritism to people in my family. In fact, I got a moral parsimony score of 17% on this aspect, which significantly lowered my overall moral parsimony score. Next, I unconsciously believed that acting and omitting aren't that different in the situations that they gave us meaning that I had quite a high moral parsimony score in that rega...