On what basis did you make your decisions?
What part of the questions did you find particularly difficult or particularly easy?
What did you learn or have reinforced for you regarding how you make ethical decisions?
First, I got a moral parsimony score of 58%. This was because there were questions at the start that didn't follow all my moral ideas. Additionally, it could have been due to one of the bases.
I based my answers on multiple different factors. First, I made sure to not have a certain favoritism to people in certain different geographical locations. Second, unconsciously I showed direct favoritism to people in my family. In fact, I got a moral parsimony score of 17% on this aspect, which significantly lowered my overall moral parsimony score. Next, I unconsciously believed that acting and omitting aren't that different in the situations that they gave us meaning that I had quite a high moral parsimony score in that regard. Additionally I decided that scale did not matter as much if the scales were even. For example, there was 1 question, which asked if you would save 10 people and put them in operations by cancelling 1 person's operation and killing him. He had the operation first and was prioritized so I decided that it would be unfair.
I found questions related to the family particularly harder as I found it harder to decide as I value each human life although in the end I did choose my family over the strangers as they did take more priority leading to my moral parsimony score of 17% in that aspect.
I have re-inforced that I mostly follow my moral ideologies as most of my moral parsimony scores were either very high or very low proving that I did do that.
What part of the questions did you find particularly difficult or particularly easy?
What did you learn or have reinforced for you regarding how you make ethical decisions?
First, I got a moral parsimony score of 58%. This was because there were questions at the start that didn't follow all my moral ideas. Additionally, it could have been due to one of the bases.
I based my answers on multiple different factors. First, I made sure to not have a certain favoritism to people in certain different geographical locations. Second, unconsciously I showed direct favoritism to people in my family. In fact, I got a moral parsimony score of 17% on this aspect, which significantly lowered my overall moral parsimony score. Next, I unconsciously believed that acting and omitting aren't that different in the situations that they gave us meaning that I had quite a high moral parsimony score in that regard. Additionally I decided that scale did not matter as much if the scales were even. For example, there was 1 question, which asked if you would save 10 people and put them in operations by cancelling 1 person's operation and killing him. He had the operation first and was prioritized so I decided that it would be unfair.
I found questions related to the family particularly harder as I found it harder to decide as I value each human life although in the end I did choose my family over the strangers as they did take more priority leading to my moral parsimony score of 17% in that aspect.
I have re-inforced that I mostly follow my moral ideologies as most of my moral parsimony scores were either very high or very low proving that I did do that.
Comments
Post a Comment